辩论赛流程英文版

a, shall be borne by the chairman of the debate

1, the debate began

2, announced the motion

3, introduce the participating team and its position

4, introduce team member

5, introduce rules, judges and staff

6, debate competition

7, the judges review

8, for audience questions, the judges score (simultaneous)

9, announced the result of the match

the debate over 10

second, the process of the debate

1, the theoretical stage defense:

(1) positive and argue against a speech made by positive and negative sides zhubian stated his own first main point. must be completed within the specified time.

(2) positive and opposite two apology speech square 2, against two contend with concise text focuses theoretically demonstrated their own point of view,

(3) positive and opposite three speech by square three, against three respectively with concise text carries on the empirical analysis, provide arguments to support his own views.

phase 2, free debate by tetragonal speak first, then the opposition spokesman, sides took turns to speak. (in a relatively concentrated period of time)

3, summarize four contend for final statement by both parties, summarizes has side view, refute each other subjective point:

(1) argue against four summation

(2) square four summation

4. audience member: the audience to questions of both players, players must give the answer patiently. stage performance is not recorded in the results of the competition between the two sides to ask a question.

5, the judges scoring stage

6, the judges review the process of both views and debate.

7, the announcement

three, the rules of the debate

1, each member must be finished within the prescribed period of time, over time, in accordance with abstained processing, and lose from team total score 5 points.

2, free debate rules free debate speech must alternates between the teams, the first to speak with a member of tetragonal, then one by opposition players, the two sides take turns, until you run out of time. (each a free debate in the concentration of two hours to complete, what time each other, each stick words between 60-800 words, can only ask a question at a time.)

fourth, criteria

(a) will be hired to review all the five judges of the game.

(2) criteria

1, point clear, argument is sufficient, citing appropriate, analyzed thoroughly.

2, grabbed the other views and error, precedents and precise, and to the point.

3, reflect agile, strong ability to deal with.

4, articulate, level clear, tight logic.

(3) the scoring method (group and individual scores respectively, out of 100)

(1) the topic: can the logic, theory, from the position held by the fact that such as multi-level and multi-angle, argument is sufficient, reasoning is clear, whether for his own difficulties with effective treatment methods.

(2) the argument: if there is a convincing argument, argument is sufficient, whether logical reasoning process, the fact whether the reference is proper, true.

(3) dispute: to ask whether to grab the key, the problem simple. no questions or questions within the time required, should be appropriate. the question of whether or not to answer each other, can you give a person the sense with justified. don't answer or not answer should be penalised accordingly.

(4) : whether to have team spirit, mutual support, debate cohesion is closely. whether q&a form an organic whole, to a powerful blow to the other party.

(5) argue the wind: the language and debate style exquisite civility. personal attacks will be made to argue each other friends and netizens.

(4) points: every topic, argument, dispute, cooperate, argue the wind project, do not conform to the requirements of the evaluation and in violation of the rules, are appropriate. due to the fault causes of incidents affect the game, is decided by the jury, in a 5-10% reduction of its cumulative total score.

(5) score project group and individual points per game comparison table is as follows:

(6) score project group and individual points per game of appraisal form

(7) good debater respectively by the outcome of each race scores are the highest return. the game of "best debater" tired integral calculation by the individual scores the highest gain, formula is: the total integral/attend the session.

(8) the outcome of judgment

1, the outcome of the game, on the basis of a few judges play group points, remove the a and a minimum points, calculating the remaining points scored an average of judgement.

2, debater individual scoring points calculation method, calculation method with groups only as an individual award review basis, has nothing to do with judging each outcome.

five, awards and incentives

1, every game are selected each a good debater each team, will decide after the game one of the best debater.

一、由辩论会主席承担

1、辩论赛逐渐

2、公布辩论

3、详细介绍参加比赛参赛队及持有观点

4、详细介绍参加比赛队友

5、详细介绍标准、评审团及工作员

6、辩论比赛

7、评委点评

8、观众们随意提出问题，评审团得分(同时进行)

9、公布赛果

10 辩论赛完毕

二、争辩全过程

1、辩方辩论结辩环节：

(1)正、反方一辩讲话先由正反面彼此主辩传出阐述己方主要观点贴。需要在规定的时间内进行。

(2)正、反方二辩讲话方形二辩、反方二辩以简约文本关键从理论上论述我方见解;

(3)正、反方三辩讲话由方形三辩、反方三辩各自以简约文本开展实证研究，为己方见解给予事实论据适用。

2、自由辩论环节由方形最先讲话，随后反方讲话，正反方先后轮着讲话。(在相对性集中化的时间内开展)

3、汇总环节由彼此四辩开展最后陈述，汇总已方见解，辩驳另一方主见解：

(1)反方四辩总结陈词

(2)方形四辩总结陈词

4、观众们提出问题：观众们对彼此队友开展提出问题，队友务必给与细心解释。提出问题环节彼此的主要表现不计入比赛成绩。

5、评审团得分环节

6、由考官对彼此见解及争辩全过程开展评价。

7、结论公布

三、争辩标准

1、每一位队友一定在规范的时间内进行，超出时长依照放弃解决，并从所属精英团队总成绩中减去5分。

2、自由辩论标准自由辩论讲话务必在双方中间更替开展，第一由方形一名队友讲话，随后由反方一名队友讲话，彼此轮着，直至时长用完才行。(每一场的自由辩论在集中化的两个小时内结束，每轮的具体时间另定，每贴的文本在60--800字中间，每一次只有提一个问题。)

四、评判标准

(一) 将聘用五位评审团对此次赛事实现全过程评定。

(二) 评定标准

1、论点论据明确，事实论据充裕，引用适当，剖析深入。

2、快速把握另一方见解及出错，驳论精到，直接了当。

3、体现灵巧，应对能力强。

4、思路清晰观点鲜明、层级清晰，逻辑性严实。

(三)得分办法(团队和自己各自计分，100分均为100分)

(1)读题：对持有观点能不能从逻辑性、基础理论、客观事实等多层面、多方位了解，论点是不是充裕，逻辑推理关联是不是明确，对己方的难题是不是具备合理的处理方法。

(2)论述：论述是不是有感染力，事例是不是充足，推理过程是不是有逻辑，客观事实引入是不是恰当、真正。

(3)争辩：提出问题能不能把握住另一方重要，难题简洁明了。在要求时间内并没有提问问题或提出问题不清，尽可能罚分。是不是正面回答另一方的难题，能不能给人一种合情合理的觉得。不回答或不正面回答应相对应罚分。

(4)相互配合：是不是有团队意识，是不是互相支持，辩论技巧对接是不是密切。问答是不是建立一个有机物总体，给别人一个强有力严厉打击。

(5)辩风：常用语言表达和争辩设计风格注重讲文明懂礼貌。不可对对方辩友和网民开展恶意中伤。

(四)罚分：凡读题、论述、争辩、相互配合、辩风新项目中，不符评定标准和违反规则的，均酌情考虑罚分。因为球队本身原因造成的紧急事件危害赛事的，由评定团决定，在其总计总成绩中扣5-10%。

(五)得分新项目每轮赛事的团队分和本人分的评定报表如下所示：

(六)得分新项目每轮赛事的团队分和本人分的评定报表

(七)每轮赛事的出色演讲人各自由输赢彼此评分最高的人得到;此次赛事的“最佳辩手”由本人积累分计算分数最高的人得到，公式计算为：总积分兑换/参与的场景。

(八)输赢分辨

1、每轮赛事的输赢，根据几个评审团所打团队分，除掉一个分数和一个最低分，测算剩下成绩的均分判断。

2、演讲人本人评分计算方式同团队分计算方式，只做为个人奖项的评定重要依据，与分辨每轮输赢不相干。

五、荣誉奖与奖赏

1、每一场比赛均评比出出色演讲人每组各一名，全部赛事后将赛出一位最佳辩手。