mba推荐信范文4篇

　　写推荐信的常见问题：

　　何时逐渐规定邀请人帮你写推荐信呢?一般来说，一旦你确定你需要办理的院校就需要下手提前准备推荐信的事儿了，随后按照不一样院校的决定与你本人的爱好来决定是根据互联网来递交推荐信呢或是给予一般的纸版版本号。下边是好多个在写推荐信的那时候要留意的事宜：

　　一定要给邀请人留出充裕的时间段来提前准备推荐信。

　　每一个申请者很有可能都是会申请办理多家院校，因此必须好几个版本升级的推荐信，尽管不一样院校问的问题有一定的反复，可是或是各有不同。假如你期待邀请人让你写一封有分量的推荐信，那麼麻烦你尽可能提早通知她们。你也许感觉，不便是多份推荐信吗?但是，每一个上班的人都比较忙，再加之申请办理 mba 的时间段一般是年末，企业里的事儿很有可能大量，也有，你也许并非唯一的一个规定这个人写推荐信的人，因此越快筹备越好。

　　留意提示推荐信的截至日期。

　　在你规定邀请人寄信时，麻烦你留意提示推荐信务必上传的日期，以防错过了申请办理机会。如果是互联网递交的，在截至日期当日递交就可以。如果是邮寄的，则还需要考虑到邮寄的时间问题。

　　让邀请人认识你的个人职业规划。

　　为了更好地让邀请人写下有感染力的推荐信，提议申请者找一个时机和邀请人好好地聊一下自个的个人职业规划，让邀请人对你的岗位方位有更加明确的构思，那样写下的推荐信才算是以问题为导向。申请者可以给邀请人给予自身的个人简历，必需时可以给予院校规定的小论文，以让邀请人对您有更深层次的掌握。

　　推荐信应以“例”服人。

　　假如推荐信仅仅人云亦云，而沒有详细的日常工作上的事例，令人感觉带血沒有肉，硬生生的一个事例顶得上引言万语，因此申请者可以协助邀请人追忆一下相处中的有趣的事，让这些人把这种事例运用到推荐信中去。

　　不一样的推荐信要紧密联系。

　　假如大学规定多封推荐信，申请者可以规定不一样的邀请人注重不一样的侧边，而不是好多个人一个模版，写出去一样的物品，那样就失去多封推荐信的实际意义。假如不一样的邀请人把着重点放到不一样的地区，那样刻画出的形像很有可能更加清楚和实际，由于对申请者有益。

　　国外的国际商学院一般都规定申请人有2～3封，被觉得是院校从各个方面掌握申请人的最充分的证明文件。一般来说，推荐信尽管不容易造成十分奇妙的功效，但对这些处在录与不录边沿的申请办理，却经常出现意想不到的实际效果。那麼挑选什么样的人写推荐信最好呢？下列有三条标准产考：

　　一、 美国商学院最亲睐的是这些与申请人有密切相关，了解其管理能力、组织协调能力或学术研究水准的人写的。邀请人务必立在理性的态度上点评你，千万别选一个很知名却对你并不了解的人，由于国际商学院期待邀请人能给予实际关键点。

　　二、 挑选真真正正喜欢你的人，仅有那样的优秀人才会想要花时间和时间精力给你写下一封好信。假如写的草率匆忙或者充满了敷衍了事套语，将使录用联合会对你的第一印象受到非常大影响。

　　三、 挑选可以表明你的重要质量和与众不同个性化的人。他最好是能就你的监管才可以、智商水准、待人接物等某一方面做进一步论述，写下一封充斥着申请人与众不同性格的推荐信。

　　找八竿子点不着的人，反倒令人感觉不可靠。一般寻找自己的老师，教务长，了解你的专家教授、公司领导较为合理。自然，如果有一位企业立即负责人、国际性知名的专家能充任你的邀请人，你申请办理院校系科的负责人专家教授又是这名著名专家教授的学员，或好朋友，那那样的推荐信毫无疑问十分强有力。

　　你应该在方案提交申报材料的时间前三个月上下逐渐找寻邀请人。选好推荐人后，下面要做的便是和他（她）以诚相待路面谈一次，向他（她）表述清晰你需要怎样的协助。对他说（她）你要申请办理什么院校，为什么挑选这些院校。最好是能向邀请人给予一份你的详细详尽的个人简历，以便捷写推荐信。假如你觉得推荐者应就某好多个领域作一下关键叙述，应当准备充分一份书面报告，例举这些你认为你的邀请人可以开始的地区。

　　不但要在评估领域有特点，更主要的是要有具体的例子做为证明。很多申请人的推荐信都是会犯一种严重错误，那便是在其中都充满了"excellent"，"distinguished"， "ambitious"，"natural born leader"那样的顶尖赞美之词，却沒有详细的事例来适用这种"论点论据"。那样不但不可以使国际商学院提升对申请人的掌握，反倒会让许多人感觉没法对申请人有一个真正的了解。申请人在和寄信的人沟通交流时，特别是在要留意这一点。

　　一般说来，国际商学院邮来的申报材料里都附带报表。邀请人可依照报表逐一填好，假如碰到无法点评的工程可以写I don’t know或unable to judge。要是没有明确的报表，邀请人可以自主按书信格式写。

　　november 2，20xx

　　letter of reference: kathleen floyd

　　dear prospective employer:

　　this is a letter of recommendation for kathleen floyd。 i have only known kathleen since may，20xx but i believe she is one of the finest students i have ever had。 i highly recommend her to you。

　　kathleen took my introductory accountancy course in may。 she excelled，earning a high a i was impressed with her intelligent and insightful questions，by her understanding of fairly complex issues，her work ethic，interpersonal skills and team skills。 it is abundantly clear that kathleen is a top student。 at the university of shaaxi at xian，china she earned a business administration degree and was the top ranked student。 students like her and wanted to participate with her。 even though she is so bright and has a tremendous work ethic，she is also a great person。 she is easy to talk to，speaks excellent english and has great interpersonal skills。

　　i encourage you to closely examine kathleen’s resume。 you will see that she has had numerous jobs that deal with working with people。 this reinforces what i tell you about herexcellent interpersonal skills。 she is friendly and personable。

　　in closing，there are three super qualities that kathleen has。 they are not just good qualities，but some of the best you will find in any person。 they are her knowledge，work ethic and interpersonal skills，including language skills。 i highly recommend this greatlady to you。 i know you will make your organization better。

　　if you have any questions，please contact me at ______。edu。 i am on a sabbatical to ireland until january，so this is the best way to contact me。

　　sincerely

　　要想给你的推荐信寻找适宜的编写人并不是件非常容易的事情。u.s news访谈了chioma isiadinso，前卡耐基梅隆高校和哈佛大学商学院的招收高官，与此同时也是《顶级商学院的申请秘诀》的创作者。在书里，他提供了许多怎样给你的推荐信挑选最好的软文写手来给你的申请办理增添光彩的提议。一起来看一下：

　　finding the right people to write your letters of recommendation is no simple task. so u.s. news asked, a former admissions official at carnegie mellon university and harvard business school and author of the book the best business schools' admissions secrets, to offer advice on choosing someone who can portray you in the best and most accurate light.

　　1. who should applicants approach to write their letters of recommendation? former professors? employers? a mix?

　　typically, recommendations for business school should come from individuals who have supervised the candidate and have a clear vantage point of a candidate's managerial potential and contributions to the organization, [as well as a] perspective of how he or she functions within a team. [the] majority of business schools require two recommendation letters, and for most applicants the ideal option is a current supervisor and a former supervisor who can attest in great detail about the candidate and the value he or she can provide to the business school community. in cases where a school requires three recommendations (as is the case for programs like harvard business school and the stanford university graduate school of business), another perspective such as a recommendation from community service [organizers] or from faculty who can attest to who you are beyond the classroom performance can be useful.

　　there are instances where a professor recommendation could be useful. these are cases where the candidate is an early career candidate with very limited work experience; in such instances, the critical information for the recommender to highlight is not basic information about the candidate's intellect and how well he or she did in the class, but rather detailed examples/anecdotes that vividly describe the candidate in terms of how he or she has enriched a class [and] character traits that can reinforce that the candidate is mature to handle business school despite being younger and possessing less work experience compared to the rest of the applicant pool. professors who can attest to your college leadership track record [and] your ability to take initiative can be useful recommendation letters at the end of the day.

　　2. is it important that the letter's writer has worked with the applicant closely on a day-to-day basis?

　　absolutely. recommendations that are most memorable and useful in evaluating a candidate are the ones that have detailed descriptions about the candidate. the more closely the recommender has worked with the candidate, the more examples he or she can share. i often see applicants opting for recommendations from more senior individuals who barely know them. in such cases, it is no surprise that such reference letters tend to be generic, lack examples, and are ineffective in painting a clear picture of who the candidate is.

　　3. do letters of recommendation from prominent figures carry much weight if they've had minimal contact with the applicant?

　　admissions people are very savvy and can see through the 'big-titled' recommendation with little substance. applicants should focus on former bosses or current bosses who have real experiences they can draw from. generic recommendation letters are wasted opportunities to differentiate yourself from your competition. i read my fair share of generic recommendation letters when serving on harvard business school's admissions board and such recommendations that came from alumni or prominent figures were easy to spot and did little to endear the candidate to the admissions board. it is always better to have a 'mid-ranked' recommender but with insight and detailed descriptions about you that allows the admissions board to get a three-dimensional view of who you are as a person.

相关内容
企业管理部研究生MBA教授英文推荐信
MBA推荐信邀请人
MBA出国留学推荐信的规定
MBA英语推荐信文件格式范例
mba推荐信 范文
MBA推荐信十大方法（英语）
推荐信--MBA（英文）
北大mba推荐信
MBA课程英文推荐信
修读MBA企业推荐信